<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.pacificaquarry.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NO on L - News Media</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18/0</link>
 <description>From the Mainstream Media</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&quot;I found a loophole&quot;... and got it rezoned</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/loophole</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Peebles made a small fortune on the Bath Club, by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inc.com/magazine/20050301/howididit.html&quot;&gt;exploiting a loophole&lt;/a&gt; that let him get the property rezoned.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The owners were asking for $25 million to $30 million, but no one was willing to pay because it wasn&amp;#39;t going to make money unless it got rezoned -- the building couldn&amp;#39;t be taller than 40 feet. The rezoning would take two years. I found a loophole that would allow us to go up to 200 feet in height and offered $10 million, contingent on the rezoning. &lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;After     the Bath Club got rezoned, a brokerage firm offered me $42 million for the     property.&amp;quot;   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/loophole&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/loophole#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/peebles">Peebles History</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/1">R. Donahue Peebles</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/10">Redevelopment Area</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:26:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">436 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>South of the Slide</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/south-of-slide</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the Peebles/Davies arguments is that the midcoast south of the slide is planning to double their population, and supposedly that means we should be happy to shoot ourselves in the foot by adding 355 houses to the two most congested intersections in Pacifica.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/south-of-slide&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/south-of-slide#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/traffic">The Traffic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/14">Traffic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:21:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">438 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>San Mateo Times says NO on L</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/san-mateo-times</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The San Mateo Times editorial board &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/sanmateo/ci_4509938&quot; &gt;recommends a NO vote on Measure L&lt;/a&gt;, saying:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;span&gt;
      &lt;span&gt;What Measure L does is permit the construction of &amp;quot;up to&amp;quot; 355 homes at the quarry site, along with commercial development. Since housing is the cash crop of this development, there&amp;#39;s little reason to believe that, if Pacificans approve L, the final project will come in with anything less than the maximum amount.&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/san-mateo-times&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/san-mateo-times#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/media">Quarry In the Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:08:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">411 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Davies spin</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/more-davies-spin</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The San Mateo Times&amp;#39; &amp;quot;Insider&amp;quot; also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_4265816&quot;&gt;published a column&lt;/a&gt; about the Davies Communications insider who posed as Pacifica residents in favor of Measure L on the Pacifica-L mailing list. The details are basically the same as have been covered elsewhere (for example, &lt;a href=&quot;/story/negative-thinkers&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/story/sock-puppet-scam&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  The interesting part is the new spin by John Davies, CEO of Davies Communications:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/more-davies-spin&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/more-davies-spin#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/facts">Fact vs. Fiction</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/40">Astroturf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/41">Davies Communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/29">Greenwashing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:09:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">289 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Davies says list readers are &quot;mostly negative thinkers&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/negative-thinkers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Barry Parr, creator of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coastsider.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Coastsider.com&lt;/a&gt;, published an &lt;a href=&quot;http://coastsider.com/index.php/site/news/1480/&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; about &amp;quot;Jimmy/Susan&amp;quot; the person(s) who posted messages to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/Pacifica-L/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Pacifica-L mailing list&lt;/a&gt;, claiming to be long-time Pacifica residents, but who apparently were associated with Peebles&amp;#39; P.R. firm, &lt;a href=&quot;/story/peebles-pr-agency&quot;&gt;Davies Communications&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/negative-thinkers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/negative-thinkers#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/facts">Fact vs. Fiction</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/40">Astroturf</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/41">Davies Communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/29">Greenwashing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/1">R. Donahue Peebles</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:30:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">281 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;He&#039;s dead in the water&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/dead-in-the-water</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On March 6th, 2005, Tribune Editor Chris Hunter is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/03/06/REG20BKR5C1.DTL&quot;&gt;quoted in the San Francisco Chronicle, warning&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;And if he [Peebles] comes here and says he wants to build 300 houses,                        he&amp;#39;s dead in the water.&amp;quot;      &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/dead-in-the-water&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/dead-in-the-water#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/traffic">The Traffic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/facts">Fact vs. Fiction</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/media">Quarry In the Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:29:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CSLover</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">280 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pacifica&#039;s &quot;Miami Beach&quot; covered in Bay Guardian</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/here-comes-miami-beach</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This week&amp;#39;s San Francisco Bay Guardian includes&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfbg.com/entry.php?entry_id=1482&amp;amp;catid=&amp;amp;volume_id=147&amp;amp;issue_id=248&amp;amp;volume_num=40&amp;amp;issue_num=48&quot; &gt; an article by G.W. Schulz about Measure L&lt;/a&gt;. The very thorough, well-researched report contains too much good information to excerpt here; by all means, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfbg.com/entry.php?entry_id=1482&amp;amp;catid=&amp;amp;volume_id=147&amp;amp;issue_id=248&amp;amp;volume_num=40&amp;amp;issue_num=48&quot; &gt;read the whole thing&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/here-comes-miami-beach&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/here-comes-miami-beach#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/traffic">The Traffic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/economy">The Economy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/environment">The Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/facts">Fact vs. Fiction</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/petition">Measure L</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/media">Quarry In the Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/24">Petition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:43:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">279 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;There is no project&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/there-is-no-project</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
  &lt;span&gt;
    &lt;span&gt;On Monday night, July 24th, Pacifica Councilmember Cal Hinton said:&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;span&gt;
      &lt;span&gt;         &amp;quot;There is no project here. There is nothing to evaluate for a report&amp;quot;
      &lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/there-is-no-project&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/story/there-is-no-project#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/facts">Fact vs. Fiction</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/petition">Measure L</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/29">Greenwashing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/24">Petition</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/10">Redevelopment Area</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:51:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">225 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>California Red Legged Frog</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/node/133</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On the front page of the July 7th, 2006 edition of the  San Francisco Chronicle, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/07/07/MNG0LJRC9U1.DTL&quot;&gt;an article about the manmade global epidemic&lt;/a&gt; that is rapidly changing the environmental world as we know it today. As the article states, &amp;quot;a strange new fungus disease that kills frogs and toads and every other species of amphibian is spreading around the globe and combined with pollution and overdevelopment, is driving more and more creatures to extinction.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/node/133&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/node/133#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/environment">The Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/8">ESHA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 22:13:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SFGS</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">133 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rising Oceans, Sinking Feeling</title>
 <link>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/node/105</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/122&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; src=&quot;/files/images/Rockawayerosion2_0.thumbnail.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Disappearing Beach: Rockaway Beach has been divided in the middle due to previous development.   In order to &amp;#39;save&amp;#39; coastal developments sea walls are constructed.  As the oceans rise the beach is essentailly drowned and we lose out.  Why should we sacrifice even more of Rockwaay Beach for any develepment so close to our coast?&quot; title=&quot;Disappearing Beach: Rockaway Beach has been divided in the middle due to previous development.   In order to &amp;#39;save&amp;#39; coastal developments sea walls are constructed.  As the oceans rise the beach is essentailly drowned and we lose out.  Why should we sacrifice even more of Rockwaay Beach for any develepment so close to our coast?&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;54&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;A local environmental reporter recently wrote an article in the San Mateo County Times about the rising oceans and problems we will be facing in the future because of them. As you know the Quarry rests on the shores of the Pacific Ocean and will be threatened by the rising seas. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pacificaquarry.org/node/105&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pacificaquarry.org/node/105#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/issues/environment">The Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pacificaquarry.org/taxonomy/term/18">News Media</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:01:27 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SFGS</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105 at http://www.pacificaquarry.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
